Tue. Jan 14th, 2020


… Because we all have opinions.

The Precious Team That Can’t Play Outdoors

How many more seasons should Essendon Bombers fans have to tolerate Pre-Season hype amounting to Home & Away Season heartache?

How much more punishment should these loyal men and women, boys and girls, have to endure, after watching their beloved football club ruin its reputation through the darkest saga ever to taint Australia’s greatest game, then squandering countless opportunities just when things finally appeared to be back on track? These are the frustration-filled questions circling through the minds of an angry Essendon army, sick and tired of the excuses and continual failings

This is, unfortunately, the sad reality facing these long-suffering fans of an underachieving football club, who haven’t experienced an AFL finals win in almost 15 years. No other club has endured such a long drought of September success, yet peculiarly, no other club continues to be hyped-up so much each summer either. There have been many theories put forward as to why this Club continues to fail. Most notably, some sections of the media point to the Club’s culture, while others point to the Club’s coach, and while I don’t disagree that each of these two factors play a role in the lacklustre results, there’s another theory which needs to be explored a little deeper.

Around January or February each year when the media sits down and analyses the playing lists of all clubs, the number of quality footballers donning the red and black is understandably attention grabbing – Shiel, Stringer, Smith, Heppell, Daniher, Hurley, Merrett, and Hooker make up the upper echelon, while the less-heralded second tier of Fantasia, Saad, McDonald-Tipungwuti, Bellchambers, Parish, and McGrath round out a list full of talent which is widely accepted within the football community as being more than competitive. Yet despite this, for some reason success continues to elude them.

Like every other Bombers fan out there, I wanted to explore why this is happening, and I think I’ve found one of the key reasons which until now, has rarely been spoken about within Melbourne’s football-mad media.

Without boring you too much and trekking too far back in time, when the Bombers made the bold decision around the turn of the millennium to ditch the MCG in favour of playing most of its home games at the new, first-of-its-kind roofed stadium at Docklands, I was quite concerned. Without doubt, the facility is a wonderful venue to watch football in, with its fan-friendly vantage points, array of up-market food and beverage options, comfortable climate control, and ease of access being so close to Melbourne’s Southern Cross Station. However would it have an impact on the Bombers’ ability to remain accustomed to the MCG, which after all is the venue a side must play well at in order to take home the holy grail?

Almost two decades have since passed and I think it’s fair to say the concerns have been realised, with the Club experiencing one of its least successful eras of its proud history which is soon to reach 150 years.

Unlike most other AFL clubs, Essendon players spend a very large portion of their time honing their skills at training, or playing games indoors. Since opening in 2013, the Club’s home base, ‘The Hangar’ is undoubtedly a state of art complex, with two senior sized football ovals outdoors and a large indoor training facility (among other facilities in the large complex). The Club’s training activities are split between indoor and outdoor, however in poor weather conditions, the option to move things indoors is often taken advantage of.

Has this helped create the softest club in the AFL?

Since the start of the 2017 season, the Bombers own an overall win-loss record of 30-27 (53%), which is about fitting of the mediocre ways which continue to plague the Club – they’re continually performing just that little bit better than average. However, delve a little deeper and you’ll find that at Marvel Stadium (Docklands) the team is a far more impressive 14-7 (67%), including a 10-3 (77%) record in their last 13 games at the venue. On the flipside, at all other venues they’re just 16-20 (44%), including 9-12 (43%) at the MCG. The comfortable surrounds of an indoor stadium, where nature’s elements of rain and wind are not required to be overcome, seem to influence the success rate markedly with a more than 23% swing. How much does 23% equate to? Five additional wins each season – enough to push them right up into Top 4 contention.

Some may argue that the quality of opponent is vastly different between the games played at Marvel Stadium and at the MCG, however that theory holds no merit when considering the Bombers have beaten Hawthorn, Geelong (twice) and Collingwood (twice) at the home of football since 2017, and lost games they were expected to win against Carlton on multiple occasions. The fact of the matter is, they haven’t been able to play consistently good football at the MCG or other venues around the country where they’re exposed to adverse playing conditions.

In addition to the vast difference in success levels between playing indoors and outdoors, the comforts afforded to the players during their weekly training regimes have left them highly vulnerable to injuries when having to brave the cooler, more slippery, and much harsher conditions outside. Their bodies are not battle-hardened and it has continually resulted in injuries to key players in recent years, having a devastating impact on the Club’s fortunes and finals aspirations. It’s a vicious cycle that keeps on repeating itself, yet nobody within the Club seems willing to admit there’s a problem at hand.

If the Bombers truly want to improve and return to their once all-conquering ways, then vast changes need to be made. A bigger emphasis must be placed on acclimatising the playing group to unfavourable conditions – be it dew, rain, cold, or wind. From an outsider’s perspective, when exposed to these conditions in recent years, the players implode. A silky-skilled, fast-paced, exciting team when playing indoors crumbles under pressure when exposed to the elements, making basic skill errors, panicking under pressure, and ultimately breaking down its structures. They look a completely different team – frazzled, indecisive, and lacking in confidence.

With nine games remaining in the 2019 season, the Bombers would need to win at least six, maybe seven, games to reach September action. Four of those games are indoors at Marvel Stadium and they’re likely to win at least three of those, perhaps all four. However the results of the other five games will be what determines the Club’s fate come the end of Round 23. Whatever the outcome, a change in approach must be prioritised in the nine months prior to the 2020 season starting. If this weakness continues to be ignored, then the frustrated fans will once again be left seething, with hopes dashed by an inability to play consistently well outdoors.

9 thoughts on “The Precious Team That Can’t Play Outdoors

  1. That’s an interesting read that all fans would need to think about because there is a definite problem with the players and game plan but surely the multitude of coaching staff would realise what blind Freddy can see.

  2. interesting yes but does that answer the real issue with in this cliub no is my answer . Leadership is missing we have a good captain who needs help with stronger leadership from the support leadership group who haven’t stood up . when the game plan is not working these are the time that leaders should be standing up not when the game is easy and everyone is getting a kick . We have lack good leadership for some time now . There is no mungral in these teams of the last 8 years .

  3. Have said it for years. We are a good indoor footy team. Other than the Carlton game, when was the last time we won in the wet? Still we continue to love our club. We have been mediocre for too long. Build a roof for the MCG and we’ll be just fine 😉

  4. This article is so spot on. On wet days at the G they keep trying to play the fast dry weather game with lots and lots of handballs and we know where that ends. Unfortunately we haven’t got enough players that can actually kick the ball but to not go to the back of the pack in

  5. I only read around 3 quarters of this. But I disagree with the only being able to play indoors. Some of our best football has been played on the G. Particularly last year. Our run started against Geelong at the G. We won all but one interstate game outdoors from memory last year.

  6. I said after the Carlton game last year that they need to train in damp conditions more use the advantage of having 2ovals have 1 wet when the weather is forcasting rain when we play outside of Marvel ok ppl might say more chance of injuries fair enough but that wasn’t a concern back at Windy Hill u take it as it comes if ur unjured at training in the wet the same could happen during a wet match as they say practise makes perfect…I agree Scott last year we did well in outside matchs but the numbers % wise doesn’t lie between the difference indoor/outdoor…

  7. You are totally right you must be able to handle a wet ball and ground conditions.
    It is a must can’t play football in the dry all the time

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.